Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Today on the ArXiv: How to ride a light beam to the stars, and how not to analyse distance indicators

Posted on Oct 3, 2016 in astro-ph, News, Research, Science

Today on the arXiv, a nice analysis of how to design a solar sail in such a way that the light beam powering it is prevented from rocking it side to side, and hence destabilising it. The key idea is to use a spherical sail (rather than conical designs as previously proposed) and a multi-modal laser beam profile. The figure below illustrates how the resulting potential “traps” the beam in the centre, thereby self-stabilising the sail (at least, insofar as the the linearised analysis presented in the paper is valid – the authors show that this withstands a 10% white noise).

 

screen-shot-2016-10-03-at-14-47-30

From Manchester and Loeb (2016), ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.09506.pdf

 

This paper uses a compilation of distance indicators, including SNIa, cosmic clocks, BAO and GRBs to measure the expansion history of the Universe in a semi-parametric way. I was disappointed to see the likelihood treated in the usual (incorrect) Gaussian way, especially for SNIa’s and (even more so!) for GRBs. Somebody needs to do a proper analysis of this one day (hint, hint). The SNIa’s part is solved, and here’s how to do it right.

Leave a Reply